20 - 24 September 2008 Manchester, UK Labour Conference 2008 A service for delegates provided by Labour Party members - updated regularly
|
|
The saga of Warwick II This year, for the first time, following pressure from Unions and CLPs, backed by CLPD, the constituencies were given the right to submit textual amendments to the 6 final-stage NPF documents. CLPs were able to submit as many amendments as they wished. But, instead of going direct to the NPF at Warwick II (25/27 July), they went instead to one of eleven regional meetings (each consisting of 7 NPF reps - 5 regional CLP reps and 2 reps elected by the whole region). Altogether over 200 CLPs submitted a grand total of some 4,000 amendments. The large majority of these sought a change of direction towards more progressive policies. At the regional meetings the 7 reps were under no obligation to progress the amendments, but they were generally encouraged to pick them up and submit them to the NPF in their own names. Around 1,500 of the CLP amendments were picked up and progressed to Warwick II. Given that there was considerable duplication of amendments, it seems likely that the vast majority of the CLP amendments were progressed. In addition, the other members of the 190-strong NPF were able to submit textual amendments to Warwick II. Many took this opportunity, especially the trade unions and the four CLGA - supported members of the NEC (Ann Black, Christine Shawcroft, Peter Willsman and Walter Wolfgang). Altogether over 2,000 amendments were submitted to the NPF. At Warwick, the Friday (25 July) was taken up by some 400 meetings between groups of NPF reps and ministers on specific policy areas, in an attempt to agree "consensus wording". The Saturday was given over to 'workshops', where the NPF reps discussed the agreed consensus wording and the outstanding amendments. At the same time, lots of side meetings with ministers were held to search for an elusive consensus. The side meetings involving union reps continued until nearly 6am on Sunday morning. Throughout this time individual reps with specific amendments were hunted down by earnest officials clutching "consensus wording". It has to be said that this process of 'cutting and sticking' was much more fraught and unprofessional than the well-ordered arrangements for compositing on the Saturday afternoons in the pre 'Partnership in Power' days. And yet, of course, devious Blairites are still trying to re-write history by pouring scorn on those good old days. During the weekend several meetings of CLP reps were called by Simon Burgess, NPF Vice-Chair representing CLPs. The 6 CLP reps on the NEC were deliberately excluded from these meetings. This was somewhat insulting, given that most of the CLP NPF reps are only elected by a handful of unmandated CLP delegates at Annual Conference, whereas the NEC reps are elected by some 20,000 party members. It would be fair to say that the 1,500 amendments that originated from CLPs did set something of a progressive mood to the weekend and, no doubt, assisted the Unions to achieve a better result. Nevertheless, as was clear in Sunday's plenary, there were distinct limits on just how progressive the NPF was prepared to be. Following their agreements with Ministers, the Unions, as a block, agreed to abstain on all amendments covering Iraq/Afghanistan, the 42 days, Trident and anything that could conceivably be considered to "cut across" the union agreements. On Sunday, in the final plenary, all outstanding amendments were voted upon. There were 161 NPF reps present at the start of the meeting. Of these some 65 were CLP reps from across all the sections (this included 5 CLP reps supported by the CLGA (the 4 NEC members and Carol Hayton, South East Region). There were some 50 TU reps present from across all the sections. 81 votes or more therefore represented a majority, and meant that an amendment was endorsed into the final document. 41 votes or more (25%) meant that an amendment went forward to Annual Conference as a Minority Position. In many cases the Platform contended that the outstanding amendments were covered by the 'consensus wording', but several movers pressed for a vote because they were not entirely convinced by this argument.
VOTES
Britain in the World
Creating Sustainable Communities
Crime, Justice, Citizenship and Equalities
Education and Skills
Health
Prosperity and Work
NPF Report
An analysis of this document is available at http://www.scgn.org.uk/
|
| © Save the Labour Party on behalf of the Grassroots Umbrella Project steering committee 2008 |